Post by nurnobisorker65 on Feb 11, 2024 8:38:45 GMT
The same trip on the same date with bus charter companies. The author alleged that tickets offered on the digital platform had an average cost of 60% lower than tickets offered at bus stations for the same routes, even without authorization from the National Land Transport Agency (ANTT) and the Sergipe State Department of Road Infrastructure (DER -SE). Therefore, he classified the operating model as irregular, clandestine and competitively unfair. In its defense, Buser highlighted that its partner companies do not use passenger terminals, have authorization from ANTT to operate and comply with all safety standards and regulatory requirements. It also clarified that there are no pre-established and.
Regular routes, guarantee of service provision or even individual charging — just apportionment of the total freight cost. Within the law Law 10,233/2001 imposes conditions for granting authorization and exploration of the activity of public road transport via charter. ANTT resolutions also regulate the topic. For judge Eliezer Siqueira de Sousa Júnior, such rules "present no obstacle to Belgium Email List the intermediation services provided" by the startup . "There is no illegality in Buser's modus operandi ", he concluded. The judge explained that the intermediation of travel "cannot be confused with the provision of the service itself", which is the responsibility of the contracted companies. The same occurs with other intermediary.
Platforms, such as iFood and Uber. "If the defendants carry out on-demand transport and they have a certain number of passengers at different times every day who wish to travel to certain destinations, shouldn't they provide such a service?", asked Sousa Júnior. In his view, denying this possibility "would be the same as corroborating the thesis that the defendant companies and interstate travel charterers cannot have a large volume of customers and users of their services" and "could not, therefore, carry out a large number of expressive number of trips per day, which must be contained to an acceptable minimum". According to the judge, "this position is counterproductive, as it denies the objective.
Regular routes, guarantee of service provision or even individual charging — just apportionment of the total freight cost. Within the law Law 10,233/2001 imposes conditions for granting authorization and exploration of the activity of public road transport via charter. ANTT resolutions also regulate the topic. For judge Eliezer Siqueira de Sousa Júnior, such rules "present no obstacle to Belgium Email List the intermediation services provided" by the startup . "There is no illegality in Buser's modus operandi ", he concluded. The judge explained that the intermediation of travel "cannot be confused with the provision of the service itself", which is the responsibility of the contracted companies. The same occurs with other intermediary.
Platforms, such as iFood and Uber. "If the defendants carry out on-demand transport and they have a certain number of passengers at different times every day who wish to travel to certain destinations, shouldn't they provide such a service?", asked Sousa Júnior. In his view, denying this possibility "would be the same as corroborating the thesis that the defendant companies and interstate travel charterers cannot have a large volume of customers and users of their services" and "could not, therefore, carry out a large number of expressive number of trips per day, which must be contained to an acceptable minimum". According to the judge, "this position is counterproductive, as it denies the objective.